Sunday, April 22, 2012
YESSS
I think that even though the South had it's own disadvantages like being less populated, having less recourses compared to the North, and such, it was still possible for them to win. The South had their own advantages just like the North. First off, they had smart generals and experienced soldiers which gave them the chance of coming up with good strategies. Secondly, the South was fighting on their homeland. From that, they could come up with ideas of where & when to get recourses when needed. They were capable of planning attacks & it became simpler for them. The South also had a motivation to fight. This meant, they knew they couldn't give up and they didn't want to either. Unlike the North who where still wondering why they were fighting and why they didn't just make peace with the South. The South also had foreign help.
The North had plenty of strengths but yet their weaknesses balanced out with the South. The South could have been weak at first but in reality they were the same as the North. The South had a reason to fight and were determined to win. History pretty much repeated itself since the same situation happened during the Revolutionary War. During the Battle of Saratoga, the British had great advantages but America had motivation. And that was a great key that helped them out and gave them the strength they needed to win.
(:
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Yupp i totally agree with this, so rite they did have a lot of advantages
ReplyDelete